![]() |
||||
![]() |
There have been many famous poems about the art of poetry throughout history, but the tradition can be traced back to the Roman poet Horace, who wrote the first of the form in name and in content. Horace was born in 65 BC and died in 8 BC. His Ars Poetica was published in 13 BC. Known for his odes and satires, he became one of the greatest Roman poets of his age. He believed poetry should instruct as well as provide pleasure to its reader. His full name was Quintus Horatius Flaccus. Below is an excerpt from Horace's poem Ars Poetica, or The Epistle to the Pisones Suppose a painter to a human head Should join a horse's neck, and wildly spread The various plumage of the feathered kind O'er limbs of different beasts, absurdly joined; Or if he gave to view a beauteous maid Above the waist with every charm arrayed, Should a foul fish her lower parts infold, Would you not laugh such pictures to behold? Such is the book, that like a sick man's dreams, Varies all shapes, and mixes all extremes. "Painters and poets our indulgence claim, Naturally, it seems strange that anyone wrote that way during any time but that was the way much poetry was written then. Today, such verse would not be jilted by the coupleted rhyme scheme and the strict sense of meter. Such is the case with Archibald McLeish’s poem of the same title. His Ars Poetica, though it rhymes, does not conform to the traditional meter of Horace’s verse. That has to do a lot with the difference between the two time periods in which both poets wrote. McLeish was born in 1892 AD and died 100 years later. He wrote much of his verse during the Modernist era, which featured such prominent poets as T.S. Eliot and Ezra Pound. In fact, Ars Poetica was written and published in 1925, at the height of the Modernist movement. Read the full poem below:
A poem should be palpable and mute As a globed fruit Dumb Silent as the sleeve-worn stone
A poem should be wordless A poem should be motionless in time Leaving, as the moon releases Leaving, as the moon behind the winter leaves, A poem should be motionless in time A poem should be equal to: For all the history of grief For love A poem should not mean If Archibald McLeish is different from Horace because of eras, personalities and philosophies then such is no less true of Czeslaw Milosz Milosz was born in Poland in 1911 and died in 2004. Though he was widely traveled and distinguished in many countries around the world, he spent most of his time in the United States after 1960. He won the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1980. His Ars Poetica? appeared in 1961. The first two stanzas appear below: I have always aspired to a more spacious form that would be free from the claims of poetry or prose and would let us understand each other without exposing the author or reader to sublime agonies. In the very essence of poetry there is something indecent: Notice that Milosz’ poem does not rhyme. Again, we see a difference between the eras and each poet within them. Milosz is considered a postmodern poet. In Postmodern poetry the language is more common and attempts to reach a popular audience through the vernacular of the common man. It does not rhyme because poets from this school of poetry believe that poetry should be written in the way that people speak. Therefore, though it looks like a poem in form, it is written - and spoken - in the natural flow of everyday language. Not all ars poeticas are titled Ars Poetica. Many poems about poetry are ars poeticas in content and form but not necessarily in title. Such is the case with the following poem by Millennial poet Allen Taylor. How To Write A PoemTake your heart out. Empty itsContents upon a thin sheet Of paper. With the five fingers Of your leftmost hand Smear the debris across the canvass Like mud. You are painting With words, the words Of your soul. To read the entire ars poetica by Allen Taylor click How To Write A Poem. Whether an ars poetica rhymes or not, follows a specific form or contains a certain rhythm is not as important as the depth and insight it provides into the art and nature of poetry. The ars poetica attempts to get to the heart of the definition of poetry without sounding like a dictionary or encyclopedia. After all, if the definition were the most important aspect of the poem then the form of poetry would not be necessary. Rather, the ars poetica poet seeks to derive a meaning of the art form not from mere words but also from the form, the rhythm, the meter and the tone. It is the entire work that defines the individual poem as well as the general form. But let’s be honest. No one can give a complete definition of poetry. No dictionary, no encyclopedia, no poet and no ars poetica has ever given the definitive and final answer to the question, “What is poetry?” In fact, such a feat may well be impossible. But that is not the point, really. What is the point is that a continual dialogue exists regarding the nature and form of poetry so that readers and writers alike may gain insight into the pure work of art that is poetry and add to the compendium of verse their own sacred souls. To the extent an ars poetica accomplishes this goal it can be said to add value to the dialogue and to the ongoing collection of poetry around the world. Check out these ars poeticas from the past and present: Ars Poetica by Horace How To Write A Poem by Allen Taylor
|
|||